Telemetry · Briefly

Capture

Submissions data is the richest source of structured legal experience data in the world. Firms create it once a year and never touch it again. It's in the Chambers docs on someone's desktop. The Legal 500 files in a shared drive. AI extracts it all, deduplicates, and turns it into a living asset.

WORKS WITH EVERY MAJOR DIRECTORY

Chambers Legal 500 IFLR1000 Benchmark WTR IP Stars

Upload any submission from any directory. AI parses the document structure, extracts every matter with its attorneys, clients, dates, and deal values, resolves entity conflicts across sources, and builds a normalized experience graph. One submission becomes dozens of structured, searchable records.

16 matters Imported Apr 30, 2026

Matter Value Attorneys

Manhattan Office Leasing Portfolio $743M 4 attorneys

Build-to-Rent Acquisition $56M 3 attorneys

Commercial Lease Transactions $612M 4 attorneys

Ground Lease Extension $115M 1 attorney

MATTER DETAIL

Manhattan Office Leasing Portfolio

CLIENT

Major Office REIT

DESCRIPTION

Represented Manhattan's largest office landlord in significant leasing transactions including a 15-year lease for 220,221 sq ft at 100 Park Avenue, a lease expansion for 184,000 sq ft at 125 Park Avenue, and retail leasing at 245 Park Avenue.

VALUE

$350M+ aggregate

ATTORNEYS

R. Sanseverino (Lead) T. Englander (Lead) D. Rosenthal P. Strauss

SUBMISSIONS

Chambers 2026 Publishable

✓ AI extracted from your Chambers submission automatically
✓ AI anonymized client names for confidentiality
✓ AI cross-linked to attorneys, practice areas, and other matters

You've already written thousands of matter descriptions across years of submissions. They're sitting on desktops, in shared drives, in email attachments. AI turns them into an experience database your whole firm can use.

Messaging Tracker

What They Claim vs. What You Claim

PE Practice — tracked from competitor websites daily

Kirkland Simpson Latham Davis Polk Weil You

Continuation funds ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ — — Gap

GP-led secondaries ✓ ✓ — ✓ ✓ — Gap

Cross-border PE ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ OK

Fund formation ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ OK

Portfolio company ✓ ✓ ✓ — — — Gap

Co-investments ✓ ✓ — — ✓ — Gap

4 Messaging Gaps Found

You have capabilities you're not claiming. Based on your internal submissions:

6 continuation fund deals in last 24 months — not on your practice page
4 co-investment transactions — not mentioned
Your PE page was last updated 14 months ago (longest gap in peer set)

Source: Daily monitoring of competitor practice pages + your internal submissions from Briefly

Ask

AI connects your experience data with competitive intelligence. Ask any question, get answers in seconds.

Research & Intelligence

RFP Research

I'm pitching a PE fund formation deal. What are Simpson and Kirkland saying about their fund capabilities?

From their current practice pages (tracked today):

Firm	Key Claims	Recent Updates
Kirkland	GP-led secondaries, continuation vehicles, ESG integration	Added ESG language (Nov)
Simpson	Continuation vehicles, co-investments, sponsor-side focus	New partner bio (Dec)
Your Firm	Cross-border, fund formation	Last updated: 8 months ago

Gap: Both competitors emphasize continuation funds prominently. Your submissions show 6 continuation deals, but your website doesn't mention this capability.

Lateral Intelligence

What's the lateral hiring activity in restructuring over the last 12 months?

From press releases and bio page changes:

Firm	Announced Hires	Source Firms	Signal
Kirkland	14 partners	Weil, Milbank, PW	Aggressive build
Weil Gotshal	Lost 6 partners	To Kirkland, K&S	Vulnerability
Davis Polk	3 partners	S&C, Cleary	Targeted adds
Your Firm	1 partner	Internal promo	Flat

Kirkland has been the most aggressive acquirer. Weil's losses may create opportunity — their remaining team could be receptive to outreach.

Referee Management

Which referees are available for our Real Estate Chambers submission? Who's already been used this quarter?

Referee availability for Real Estate (Q2 2026):

Client Contact	Company	Last Used	Status
M. Thompson	Major Office REIT	—	Available
J. Rodriguez	National REIT	—	Available
S. Chen	PE Real Estate Fund	Mar 2026	Used (90-day window)
D. Williams	Developer LLC	Feb 2026	Used (90-day window)

2 referees available. S. Chen will be available again after June 15. R. Sanseverino has tagged both available contacts — coordinate before submission.

Messaging Analysis

What are our competitors saying about M&A that we're not?

Analyzing M&A practice pages across peer set:

Capability	Who Claims It	You
ESG due diligence	Kirkland, Simpson, Latham, Davis Polk	Not mentioned
SPAC de-SPAC experience	Simpson, Weil, Skadden	Not mentioned
Cross-border carve-outs	Kirkland, Latham	Mentioned
Regulatory/antitrust integration	All 6 competitors	Not mentioned

Trend: 4 of 6 competitors added ESG language to M&A pages in the last 6 months. Your M&A page hasn't been updated since May 2025.

Content Strategy

How do Kirkland's PE partner bios compare to ours? What are we missing?

Kirkland PE partner bio patterns (from daily monitoring):

Element	Kirkland	Your Firm
Lead with deal value	Yes — "$50B+ in transactions"	No — "extensive experience"
Specific fund sizes	Yes — "funds ranging from $500M to $25B"	No
Industry specialization	Yes — called out early	Sometimes
Cross-border emphasis	80% of bios mention this	40% of bios

Your partners have comparable deal experience but undersell it. J. Martinez has done $4.2B in PE transactions but her bio says "extensive experience." Recommend updating to match Kirkland's specificity.

Website Strategy

Our PE practice page hasn't been updated in a while. What should we add based on what competitors are doing?

Your PE page last updated: 14 months ago. Here's what competitors have added since:

Trend	Who Added It	When
Continuation funds / GP-led secondaries	Kirkland, Simpson, Davis Polk, Latham	Last 6 months
ESG integration language	Kirkland, Simpson, Weil	Last 4 months
Specific fund size ranges	Kirkland, Simpson	Last 3 months
Co-investment capabilities	Simpson, Weil	Last 2 months

Based on your submissions, you have experience in all four areas. Your competitors are claiming capabilities you're not mentioning. I can draft updated copy if helpful.

Pitch Prep

We're pitching against Latham and Kirkland for a healthcare PE deal. What do they claim that we should differentiate against?

Healthcare PE positioning comparison:

Claim	Kirkland	Latham	You
Regulatory expertise	Emphasized	Emphasized	Emphasized
Payor/provider M&A	Specific deals listed	Mentioned	Not on website
Healthcare tech focus	Dedicated section	Dedicated section	Not mentioned
Value-based care experience	Mentioned	Not mentioned	Not mentioned

Your differentiation opportunity: Your submissions show 3 value-based care transactions in 24 months. Neither competitor mentions this. Lead with it.

Cross-Sell Intelligence

Which of our M&A clients are using other firms for tax work?

From your matter data + competitor press releases:

Client	Your Work	Their Tax Counsel	Source
Acme Corp	M&A (3 deals)	Skadden	Press release, Oct 2025
Vista Partners	Fund formation	Davis Polk	Press release, Aug 2025
Horizon Health	M&A	Kirkland	Press release, Nov 2025

3 clients using you for M&A but other firms for tax. Acme has the highest deal volume. Worth a conversation with the relationship partner.

Rankings Intelligence

How has Kirkland's Real Estate ranking moved vs ours over the last 3 cycles?

Chambers USA Real Estate — 3-Year Movement:

Firm	2024	2025	2026	Trend
Kirkland	Band 2	Band 2	Band 1	↑ Rising
Your Firm	Band 2	Band 2	Band 2	— Flat
Simpson	Band 1	Band 1	Band 1	— Holding

Kirkland moved to Band 1 after adding 3 laterals and submitting 40% more matters than the prior cycle. Your matter count was flat. Consider a band-up campaign for 2027.

Strategic Planning

Which practices are credible band-up candidates for next cycle?

Band-Up Opportunity Analysis:

Practice	Current Band	Matter Strength	Referee Strength	Verdict
Healthcare PE	Band 3	Strong (12 matters)	4 available	High potential
Real Estate Finance	Band 2	Strong (8 matters)	2 available	Moderate
Tech M&A	Band 2	Mixed (5 matters)	1 available	Not ready

Healthcare PE has the strongest case: 12 publishable matters, 4 strong referees available, and Band 3 peers have weaker profiles. Recommend concentrating effort here for 2027.

Create

AI drafts submissions, RFPs, bios, and alerts from your data. Your team reviews and refines. They don't start from scratch.

Work Product

Chambers Submission

Draft our 2027 Chambers submission for Intellectual Property in California. Use the official format.

Here's your draft submission:

SUBMISSION FORM

A1 Firm name

Crane Sterling LLP

A2 Practice Area

Intellectual Property

A3 Location

California

B7 What is this department best known for?

Our California IP practice has handled 47 patent litigation matters in the past 24 months, including 12 cases valued over $100M. We represent technology leaders across semiconductors, life sciences, and software, with particular strength in standard-essential patent disputes and trade secret litigation. Recent highlights include obtaining summary judgment dismissal in a $340M patent case for Nextera Systems and securing a TRO within 72 hours for BioGenix in a trade secret matter...

Publishable Matter 1

D1 Name of client

Nextera Systems

D2 Summary of matter

Lead defense counsel in $340M patent infringement action brought by major semiconductor competitor. Obtained summary judgment dismissal on all claims...

D3 Matter value

$340,000,000

D5 Lead partner

Sarah Chen

I've drafted 4 publishable matters from your submission history. Competitors Kirkland and Latham both emphasize standard-essential patents — I've led with your Nextera case to match that positioning.

RFP Response

We received an RFP for a healthcare PE acquisition. Draft a response using our standard format.

Here's your draft RFP response:

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Healthcare PE Acquisition — Legal Services

Prepared for: Horizon Health Partners | May 2026

1. FIRM OVERVIEW & RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

Crane Sterling has advised on 23 healthcare PE transactions in the past 36 months, representing aggregate deal value of $4.8B. Our team combines deep regulatory expertise with efficient deal execution — our average close time for healthcare acquisitions is 47 days from signing.

2. PROPOSED TEAM

Sarah Chen, Partner — Healthcare M&A Lead

15 healthcare PE deals, including 3 platform acquisitions over $500M

Michael Torres, Partner — Regulatory

Former CMS counsel, leads healthcare regulatory diligence

Jennifer Walsh, Counsel — Value-Based Care

Specialist in payor/provider transactions and VBC arrangements

3. REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS

• Advised Vista Partners on $420M acquisition of regional hospital network (2025)
• Lead counsel for Horizon PE on $280M physician practice platform build (2024-25)
• Represented Summit Health in $180M value-based care joint venture (2024)

I've matched your standard RFP format. Note: Kirkland's recent RFP wins emphasize value-based care experience — I've added Jennifer Walsh to differentiate, based on your 3 VBC transactions they don't know about.

Submission Conversion

Convert our Chambers IP submission to Legal 500 format. I don't want to copy and paste everything again.

Done. Here's your Legal 500 submission:

Legal500 Submissions

United States 2027 Edition

Firm Name

Crane Sterling LLP

What is the Team or Department Name (as used by your firm)

Intellectual Property

Head(s) of Team

Name	Location
Sarah Chen	San Francisco
Michael Torres	Palo Alto

Your practice: what sets your practice apart from other firms?

Our California IP practice has handled 47 patent litigation matters in the past 24 months, including 12 cases valued over $100M. We are known for standard-essential patent disputes and trade secret litigation, with particular strength in semiconductors and life sciences...

Clients: publishable clients

Active key clients (over the last 12 months)	New client (yes/no)
Nextera Systems	No
BioGenix	Yes
Cloudware Inc.	No

Converted from your Chambers submission. I reformatted the practice description for Legal 500's "what sets you apart" question and pulled the client list from your matter database. Ready for your review.

Client Alert

Draft a client alert about the new Delaware LLC amendments for our PE clients. Use our standard format.

Here's your draft alert:

CRANE STERLING

LLP

SAN FRANCISCO · NEW YORK · LONDON

CLIENT ALERT May 2026

Delaware Amends LLC Act: Key Changes for PE Fund Sponsors

On April 15, 2026, Delaware enacted significant amendments to the Limited Liability Company Act that will impact fund formation and governance. The changes take effect August 1, 2026.

Key Changes

1. Enhanced Fiduciary Duty Waivers. The amendments clarify that LLC agreements may eliminate fiduciary duties entirely, provided the waiver is "clear and unambiguous."

2. Series LLC Modifications. New provisions streamline the formation of protected series, reducing administrative burden for multi-asset structures.

3. Electronic Consent. Members may now provide consent via electronic means without additional LLC agreement provisions...

For more information, contact Sarah Chen (schen@cranesterling.com) or David Park (dpark@cranesterling.com).

I drafted this using your previous Delaware LLC alerts as a style guide. I also checked what Kirkland and Simpson published on this topic — they haven't issued alerts yet, so you have a first-mover opportunity.

Matter Description

Write a matter description for the Vista Equity fund formation deal. I need it for our experience database.

Here's the matter description:

MATTER DESCRIPTION

Vista Equity Partners — Fund IX Formation

Matter #2025-4892

Closed: March 2026

CLIENT

Vista Equity Partners

MATTER TYPE

Fund Formation

VALUE

$2.4B

LEAD PARTNER

J. Martinez

JURISDICTIONS

Delaware, Cayman Islands, UK

DESCRIPTION

Represented Vista Equity Partners in the formation of its $2.4 billion Fund IX, a technology-focused private equity fund targeting enterprise software investments. Advised on fund structuring across Delaware, Cayman Islands, and UK vehicles, LP negotiations with institutional investors including sovereign wealth funds and public pension plans, and regulatory compliance across multiple jurisdictions. Negotiated side letters with 40+ limited partners and coordinated parallel fund structures for tax-sensitive investors.

Current Bio:

"David Park is a partner in the Private Equity practice. He has extensive experience advising sponsors and portfolio companies on complex transactions across various industries."

Revised Bio:

"David Park has led more than $8.5B in PE transactions over the past five years, advising sponsors on fund formations ranging from $400M to $3.2B. His practice focuses on technology and healthcare buyouts, with particular expertise in cross-border carve-outs. Recent representations include lead counsel roles for Vista Equity, Thoma Bravo, and Silver Lake."

I pulled deal values and client names from your matter database — not from David's memory of what he's worked on. This now matches Kirkland's specificity. They lead 90% of PE bios with dollar figures.

MCP

Two data sources. One intelligence layer.

Telemetry exposes your competitive intelligence via Model Context Protocol. Any AI tool can query it directly.

INTERNAL

Your experience data

Every submission, every matter, every client relationship. Extracted, structured, and tracked over time.

Submissions Matters Clients Attorneys

EXTERNAL

The market

3,000+ firm websites monitored daily. Attorney movements, practice positioning, rankings trajectories.

Competitors Rankings Laterals Positioning

Combined and exposed via MCP. Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, or your firm's own AI tools can query it directly.

ACCESS IT HOWEVER YOU WANT

Telemetry UI

Chat interface for BD and marketing

Any AI assistant

Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot via MCP

Your firm's AI tools

Proprietary agents, custom platforms

WHAT YOU CAN ASK

Query competitors

"How has Kirkland's restructuring practice grown?"

Draft submissions

"Generate our Chambers PE submission"

Build pitches

"Create a pitch deck for healthcare M&A"

Find cross-sells

"Which M&A clients aren't using us for tax?"

Track rankings

"Where are we losing ground vs. peers?"

Generate bios

"Update Sarah's bio with recent PE deals"

One AI that watches the legal market, finds your edge, and does the heavy lifting.

They're positioning faster. You're still gathering information.

Capture

Monitor

Ask

Create

What changes when you have Telemetry

Capture

Manhattan Office Leasing Portfolio

Monitor

Competitive Intelligence Report

Messaging Gaps

Competitor Moves

Rankings Watch

Kirkland announced 2 restructuring partners from Weil

Simpson updated their PE practice page

Your PE rankings improved: Band 2 in Chambers, Elite in Legal 500

3 competitors added 'ESG' language to M&A pages this quarter

What They Claim vs. What You Claim

4 Messaging Gaps Found

Activity Feed

Ask

From their current practice pages (tracked today):

From press releases and bio page changes:

Referee availability for Real Estate (Q2 2026):

Analyzing M&A practice pages across peer set:

Kirkland PE partner bio patterns (from daily monitoring):

Your PE page last updated: 14 months ago. Here's what competitors have added since:

Healthcare PE positioning comparison:

From your matter data + competitor press releases:

Chambers USA Real Estate — 3-Year Movement:

Band-Up Opportunity Analysis:

Create

Here's your draft submission:

Here's your draft RFP response:

Done. Here's your Legal 500 submission:

Here's your draft alert:

Here's the matter description:

Current Bio:

Revised Bio:

Two data sources. One intelligence layer.

Why this pays for itself